a berlin blog


Friday, April 28, 2006
 

Free Debate in the West

Here's what William Pfaff wrote a few weeks ago about the infamous Mearsheimer-Walt paper.
What are very striking are the virulence as well as the volume of the attacks being made on the authors. The Klu Klux Klan smear has been the least of it. Their paper has been compared to Nazi propaganda of the 1930s and to the czarist-era forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (which still circulates in the Arab world).

In fact, Mearsheimer and Walt are recognized and respected political scholars in the so-called realist tradition, which regards the defense and promotion of the national interest of states as the chief purpose of foreign policy. Their paper is a responsible document of public importance.

The venom in the attacks made on it risks the opposite of its intended effect by tending to validate the claim that intense pressures are exercised on publishers, editors, writers, and on American universities to block criticism, intimidate critics, and prevent serious discussion of the American-Israeli relationship.
Israel isn't one of my big themes, but free speech is. That's the reason I wrote about Rachel Corrie. I don't have an opinion about the "Israel lobby" in America. But Pfaff is right -- dragging in the politically irrelevant David Duke, or Hitler, or neo-Nazis, whenever someone dares to criticize Israeli politics or mention Palestinian suffering makes rational debate impossible.

Never mind the fact that the hard Christian right in America is a lot more loony and paranoid about Jewish conspiracies, Alan Greenspan, international banking, Paul Wolfowitz, and New York in general than the left -- whatever you might read on Little Green Footballs ...

posted by Michael Scott Moore | 3:56 PM
Comments: Post a Comment

links
archives





Too Much of Nothing, a novel




Politics and Prose




about our editor



The Underground Grammarian



current Berlin blog page